March 9, 2011 | 1 Comment
If the past few weeks has shown us anything, it is that the Opposition parties are on the warpath. From Bev Oda to Jason Kenney and now to Nigel Wright, the resignation calls have been flying fast and furious in the House of Commons. And has almost become their comically ironic role, the government seems incapable of not handing the Opposition fresh ground for incredulity on an almost week-by-week basis.
The Opposition game plan has become clear: they are bound and determined to find this government’s sponsorship scandal — the one issue that will invoke outrage amongst the electorate and ensure the government’s defeat. And yet, no matter how hard they try or how many opportunities the government keeps handing them, nothing the Opposition parties serve up seems to stick.
Polling seems to suggest that this government has an almost Teflon coating to it. A series of public opinion outfits showed the Conservative Party nearing — and in some cases crossing the threshold of — a majority government. And while those buoyant numbers have since receded, all of the controversy stirred up by the Opposition parties doesn’t seem capable of denting this government’s hold on at least a minority position.
Have the Opposition parties just not found the right issue yet? Perhaps, but the sponsorship scandal wasn’t the only factor that lead to the 2006 eradication of the Liberals thirteen year hold on government. The other ingredient to that fateful turn of political events was the existence of a clear and viable alternative.
By 2006, Stephen Harper and his newly united Conservative Party of Canada had spent three years defining and disseminating a compelling counter-narrative to the then moribund Liberal legacy. It was an alternative that gave Canadians, tiered of the Liberals and angry over their corruption, somewhere to go in the face of a scandal that couldn’t be spun out of existence.
Indeed, it is that that very narrative that is now being used to tarnish this government. Integrity, transparency, accountability, openness: these were the catch words of a new government that caught the political wind of an exasperated electorate and gave disaffected voters a place to land.
It wasn’t enough that Canadians circa 2006 wanted to vote against the Liberals, they needed something to vote for instead. The Conservative alternative gave them that option and created the political dynamics in which we now find ourselves.
The problem then is not that this government doesn’t have a sponsorship scandal. It is rather that the Opposition parties have not built an effective alternative with which to woo voters when that scandal comes around.
A coalition government of the variety toyed with in 2008 might have presented such an alternative. But the Tories have effectively condemned the idea as somehow anti-democratic. And the players in such a coalition have all retreated to their respective sides, unwilling to resurrect the possibility for fear of recrimination.
On their own, none of the individual parties has captured the imagination of the electorate with an inspiring alternative. Their focus, it seems, remains trained on finding the scandal instead of building the alternative. Experience of the past five years has taught us that this is a misplacement of effort.
Left to their own devices, the Tories seem incapable of avoiding perfectly avoidable scandals.
As CBC’s Greg Weston suggests, perhaps this latest in and out campaign financing issue will be enough to scorch Stephen Harper and the Party once it has fully played out. But without a persuasive alternative put forward by the Opposition, that scorching is unlikely to leave much more than singe marks.
This government — like those before it — seems destined to sew the seeds of its own demise. But whether that death is sudden or drawn out lies largely in the hands of the Opposition parties. Until Jack Layton and Michael Ignatieff stop focusing on why Canadians shouldn’t vote for Stephen Harper and start focusing on why Canadian should vote for them, 2011 — and years to come — will not play out like 2006.